Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Season's Greetings

Dear NTUEE64 Classmates,



Wish all of you a Merry Christmas and a Happy and Healthy New Year!



AJ reminded recently me that our next class reunion is supposed to be about a year from now at Les Vegas. It is about time for us to think more about it and to propose further detail plan.



Best regards,



Paul Chen

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Foof & Wine - Chinese Style

A long while back I was shopping at a liquor store (in Minnesota, we get liquor and wine at liquor store, not grocery store) when the manager, who was our neighbor and was helping a yuppie type couple pick a wine, asked me what wine would pair well with Peiking duck. To help my neighbor, I thought hard for awhile and told them, dark BEER. You could see the dejection shown on the young couple's faces.

Really, I didn't know how to pair a certain type of western or Chinese wine with a particular Chinese food or dish. To this day, it continues to be an intriguing subject for me. Since we have such a vast collective knowledge among our classmates, I would like to throw a brick and hopefully draw in some jades.

A disclaimer. I am not a connoisseur of food or wine of any kind; whether Chinese, French, Italian or Japanese, or Thai for that matter. Heck, I cannot even claimed to have had a dish prepared by a Chinese royal chef or any French or Italian dish by a 5-star chef from New York, Chicago, Milan or Paris. As for wine, I can hardly distinguish among the different wines produced in Napa or Sonoma alone, not to mention those outrageous varieties from Italy, France or Spain.

The Italian and French are known for their arts of food and wine pairng, where one compliments the other. I know no such arts in any Chinese cuisine. For one thing, the Chinese wines are fundamentally different from European wines both in ingredients and processes. And as far as I know (I might be utterly ignorant), Chinese drink liquor or wine simply to get intoxicated or loosened up so the brain becomes less inhibited (we have way too much taboo along with our rich culture) that the genius of beautiful poems, paintings and calligraphies can spout out freely; or, like in the martial art novels, that the welled up energy can be maximally released. It seems to me, the enhencement of food with wine or wine with food is the least of our concern or interest. Either the food is great or the wine is great, but never a praise of the combination of food AND wine.

In a way, I wonder if it really makes sense to try to pair western wines with Chinese food, since China is not a grapes growing land. If we had grapes in China, with our ancesters' unmatched cleverness, I would bet we would have had the most wonderful wines to go with any of the countless wonderful regional dishes.

So, where are we? Again, in today's global competition for food prestige, if Chinese wants to claim a seat at the head table, we have to come up with some wines that compliment the food. And the wines may become significant national revenue. A good idea, don't you think? Sorry, I got carried away again, as usual.

Please share your experience or opinion, so we can all learn something in food and wine - Chinese style. I am itching to try any recommendation.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

美式足球

美式足球

昨天佛羅里達大學橄欖球隊用以31比 20戰勝阿拉巴馬大學 。 成為「東南聯盟」的冠軍 。 再加一場比賽,它可能成為全國冠軍。 全校一片沸騰。 近年來,佛大橄欖球打得非常好 。 每個週末,整個大學校園像是開嘉華年會 。有人聲稱這是各州立大學的一個「陰謀」 。州立大學依法必須招收許多不太合格的學生。他們對讀書不感興趣,特別在週末。「小人不可久處約」。閒著可能引起麻煩。有了球賽,從星期五的晚會,到星期六的比賽,到星期日的狂歡或沮喪,週末就過去了,而且學校也趁機賺了大錢。想想, 足球教練的薪水是校長的10倍。 我的汽車也幾次因此被拖。因為很多停車場為了校友看球過夜停放旅行車, 在星期五6點半之後,教授就不能停車了。 有時忘記時間,我的汽車被拖,還得付罰款。又被學校賺了。

我剛到美國的時候,總覺得橄欖球是以蠻力取勝。在我看來,不論是帶球短衝還是投球長跑,帶球者老是會被對方絆倒在地,混打成一團。而且,那誇張的護肩和頭盔,試把一個人退化成猩猩。學校的高年學長告訴我這是典型的美國文化,重力不重智。特別那時越戰打的美國人灰頭灰臉。一味以火力蠻幹。正是橄欖球文化的投影。 後來,我漸漸發現橄欖球並不只是以蠻力取勝。需要智勇雙全。並且智慧比體力更為重要。在所有集體運動中,我覺得橄欖球用的智力最多。

中國在今年奧運會上贏得最多的金牌。幾乎都來自個人項目。在大的集體運動中,如籃球,足球,或棒球。中國什麼也沒有。個人項目取決於個人。中國人可不會輸,但集體運動需要合作。中國人缺點就出來了。當然桌球和羽球的雙打也要合作,但他們的合作只有兩個人。棒球需要的合作較少,籃球和足球較多,但他們都比不過美國的橄欖球。因此美國中學和大學用橄欖球作為主要運動項目是有理由的。或許這是美國人能合作得更好的原因吧?

我們從童年起就知道中國人像一盤散沙。最近我多次看見,「台灣人沒路用」這句話。說這話的人不意味著台灣個人沒用。他感嘆的是台灣人不能合作。柏楊曾經說中國人不合作不是我們不知道合作的好處。 中國人能寫一本甚至一火車有關合作好處的書,但是就是不能合作。柏老這次看走了眼。怎麼可能聰明的中國人知道合作的好處而不合作?其實合作有一個壞處,它可以遮蓋所有的好處。合作也意味著犧牲,搞不好會吃虧上當。聰明的中國人當然知道,只是不說出來而已。

合作之難,可以從生物的演化史上看到。從化石的見證,單細胞生物大約在30億年前開始出現。猜猜看,從單細胞演化到第一個多細胞生物化了多少年?化了大約30億中三分之二的時間(注1)。多細胞生物在十億多年前才出現的。為什麼?合作真難。細胞我為什麼為了細胞你就犧牲復製?人體裡有兆個以上的細胞。他們都為卵或精細胞犧牲他們自己分裂權力 (除癌細胞之外,他們拒絕再犧牲)。他們也都是歷經了至少35億年的艱苦歲月,不曾停止過奮鬥的。但是今天,他們決定為那些卵或精細胞犧牲了。多麼大的犧牲﹗「為有犧牲多壯志,敢教日月換新天」。 如果沒有這麼多細胞的犧牲,我們仍會停留在單細胞生物的過程。由此觀之,人類社會再往前進,就要看那一個制度最能推動社會成員的合作。美國之所以為美國,有她的道理。

我的高中在屏東高雄,那時就知道北部有個建國中學。如雷貫耳。到達台北以後,我意識到建中有一個橄欖球隊。這可能是台灣唯一的中學橄欖球隊。現在看起來,建中不僅聯考第一。他們在體育上也有遠見。建中之所以為建中,是有她的道理(注2)。
楊照崑

注1︰ 可在 google上查到。地球約在46億年前形成。單細胞生物約在38億到20億年前已經存在,多細胞生物在8億年前開始出現。魚類在5億年前開始大量出現,恐龍在2億到7千萬年前統治地球。開始慢,後來快。不久的將來,新的物種几天就可以用生物工程製造出來。

注2︰要瞭解建中請看幸峰兄寫的 All Kinds of Everything Remind me of ...
幸峰談到當年在建中班上來了一個漂亮年輕的英文女老師,〞Everybody treated her like a sister”可見建中是比我們南部文明多了。如果我們有這種好運,心裡想的就像街上唱的一樣,「給我一個吻,可以不可以」(見維龍兄的 comment)。那裡會去煩惱 Seven Lonely Days 是什麼意思。